期刊
出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.140615
关键词
Warm forming; Aluminium alloys; Work hardening; Precipitates; Modified nes model
This study focused on investigating the work-hardening behavior of strained hardened Al alloys at different temperatures and strain rates, revealing that temperature has the most significant impact on yield strength and work-hardening rate. The study found that as temperature increases, the work-hardening rate decreases due to reduced efficiency of storing dislocations and increased dynamic recovery.
Attempts have been registered scientifically mostly for strained hardened Al alloys towards improvement of formability at warm temperatures. The varieties of possible precipitate populations add complexity in determining the mechanisms of work-hardening behaviour of the precipitation hardened alloys. Efforts were made, in the current work, to investigate the work-hardening response for EN AW-6016 and EN AW-6061 sheets of different temper (T4 and T6) at room and warm temperatures (150 and 250 degrees C) and at two different strain rates (0.1 and 0.01 s(-1)) through tensile experiments. Among these variants, the influence of temperature has been detected the most on yield strength and work-hardening rate. Lowering the efficiency of storing dislocations as well as activating dynamic recovery, both are responsible for the reduction in work hardening rate proportionally with temperature. The work-hardening model originally developed by Prof. E. Nes (Nes model) has been chosen to simulate the experimental stress-strain response of both alloys at room and warm temperature as the phenomenology of the model promised a better constitutive description of work hardening. Because Nes model was primarily designed for strained hardened Al alloys, the bottleneck, to apply this model for precipitation hardened alloys, was removed by adding contribution from the precipitates in terms of mean slip length of dislocations in the current version. The validity of the model was examined for 130 degrees C, 150 degrees C and 180 degrees C and at a strain rate of 0.1s(-1), once satisfied fitting was achieved for 6016 and 6061 alloys at RT and 250 degrees C at a strain rate of 0.01s(-1). The decrease of dynamic recovery during the change of temper state (T4 to T6) during RT deformation can be explained as a competition between solute depletion and precipitate growth. With minute quantitative differences, the influence of strain rate and temperature was reproduced well by the model.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据