4.3 Article

Effects of surface condition of conductive electrospun nanofiber mats on cell behavior for nerve tissue engineering

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111795

关键词

Electrospinning; Cellulose; Conductive polymer; PC12 cells; Nerve tissue engineering

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51473133]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018 M633524]
  3. International Cooperation Project of Shaanxi Province [2015KW-016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that modified conductive polymer scaffolds provide more protein adsorption sites, facilitating cell attachment and growth. Compared to pure EC scaffolds, more cells were able to adhere and grow on the modified mats, exhibiting more complete and clearer morphology.
Electrospun nanofibrous scaffold is a promising implant for peripheral nerve regeneration. Herein, to investigate the effect of surface morphological features and electrical properties of scaffolds on nerve cell behavior, we modified electrospun cellulose (EC) fibrous mats with four kind of soluble conductive polymers derivates (poly (N-(methacryl ethyl) pyrrole) (PMAEPy), poly (N-(2-hydroxyethyl) pyrrole) (PHEPy), poly (3-(Ethoxycarbonyl) thiophene) (P3ECT) and poly (3-thiophenethanol) (P3TE)) by an in-situ polymerization method. The morphological characterization showed that conductive polymers formed aggregated nanoparticles and coatings on the EC nanofibers with the increased fiber diameter further affected the surface properties. Compared with pure EC scaffold, more PC12 cells were adhered and grown on modified mats, with more integral and clearer cell morphology. The results of protein adsorption study indicated that modified EC mats could provide more protein adsorption site due to their characteristic surface morphology, which is beneficial to cell adhesion and growth. The results in this study suggested that these conductive polymers modified scaffolds with special surface morphology have potential applications in neural tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据