4.6 Article

Magnetic rod induced asymmetric membrane: Effect of iron oxide composition to phenol removal by adsorption

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 258, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123862

关键词

Magnetic rod; Membrane; Particle migration; Iron oxide; Phenol adsorption

资金

  1. Malaysia Ministry of Education (MOE) [R.J090301.7809.4J181, R.J090301.7851.4J429]
  2. Malaysia Research University Network (MRUN) [R.J130000.7851.4L869]
  3. Research Management Centre (RMC), UTM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic induce casting can orient and migrate iron oxide within the membrane matrix without the need for additional chemicals or complicated procedures, resulting in increased porosity and water flux of the membrane, a hydrophilic surface, as well as effective filtration and removal of harmful substances.
Particle migration within membranes with different iron oxide compositions was prepared by traditional casting under direct exposure to a magnetic rod. Membrane with 30 wt% of iron oxide (M30) has shown a high concentration of Fe element within its thin layer compared to other membranes with lower iron oxide content. The high Fe element in the M30 thin layer has contributed to its porous structure (58.9% porosity), the most porous among the membranes. Hence, it explained the high water flux of the M30 membrane at 75.4 L/m(2).h, while the pristine N0 membrane only managed 20.1 L/m(2).h. Due to particle migration towards the membrane surface, all magnetically induce membrane were able to obtain a contact angle below 70 degrees, characteristic of a hydrophilic surface. Moreover, due to the accumulation of iron oxide as a result of magnetic casting, the M3 membrane was able to remove 14.1% of phenol with a sieving coefficient of 0.86. To conclude, magnetic induce casting has the capability of orienting and migrating the iron oxide within the membrane matrix without the need for an additional chemical or complicated procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据