4.7 Article

Impact of microplastic addition on degradation of dibutyl phthalate in offshore sediments

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111881

关键词

Microplastics; di-n-Butyl phthalate (DBP); Degradation; Offshore sediments

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the effects of microplastics on the degradation of Di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) in offshore sediments. Results showed that microplastics at different concentrations affected the degradation percentage of DBP, with higher sorption ability microplastics leading to lower degradation percentage. Microbial community structure was more influenced by microplastic type than concentration. The findings suggest that the persistence of pollutants in the coastal environment is dependent on the type and concentration of microplastics.
In this work, effects of microplastics (polypropylene and polystyrene) at four concentrations (0.2-10%, w/w) on di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) degradation in offshore sediments were investigated. DBP degradation percentage was enhanced by 0.2% microplastics (7.3-11.0% increment) but was reduced by 2-10% micmplastics (3.7-27.7% decrement). Meanwhile, addition of micmplastics with higher sorption ability to DBP led to lower DBP degradation percentage. The initial concentration of bioavailable DBP in sediments decreased with the increase of microplastic sorption ability to DBP and microplastic concentration. Microbial community structure was more significantly influenced by microplastic type than by micmplastic concentration. Significant positive correlation was observed between the total relative abundances of dominant DBP-degraders and DBP degradation percentage. The results indicated that the changes in DBP degradation percentage were related to both DBP bioavailability and the total relative abundances of dominant DBP-degraders. Hence, persistence of the pollutant in the coastal environment was microplastic type- and concentration-dependent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据