4.7 Review

Fucoidan Structure and Its Impact on Glucose Metabolism: Implications for Diabetes and Cancer Therapy

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md19010030

关键词

fucoidan; natural bioproducts; antidiabetic; anticancer; glucose metabolism

资金

  1. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) In-Region Scholarship [57408782]
  2. South African National Research Foundation (NRF) [116951]
  3. Henderson Scholarship
  4. National Research Foundation of South Africa [98566, 105829]
  5. Rhodes University
  6. Pearson and Young Memorial scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fucoidans are complex polysaccharides derived from brown seaweeds with reported bioactive characteristics such as antidiabetic and anticancer properties. However, the understanding of the structure and biological activity of fucoidan remains unclear. Limited data exists on the dual chemotherapeutic efforts for the link between diabetes and cancer.
Fucoidans are complex polysaccharides derived from brown seaweeds which consist of considerable proportions of L-fucose and other monosaccharides, and sulphated ester residues. The search for novel and natural bioproduct drugs (due to toxicity issues associated with chemotherapeutics) has led to the extensive study of fucoidan due to reports of it having several bioactive characteristics. Among other fucoidan bioactivities, antidiabetic and anticancer properties have received the most research attention in the past decade. However, the elucidation of the fucoidan structure and its biological activity is still vague. In addition, research has suggested that there is a link between diabetes and cancer; however, limited data exist where dual chemotherapeutic efforts are elucidated. This review provides an overview of glucose metabolism, which is the central process involved in the progression of both diseases. We also highlight potential therapeutic targets and show the relevance of fucoidan and its derivatives as a candidate for both cancer and diabetes therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据