4.7 Article

How a Polymer Brush Interacts with Inclusions and Alters Their Interaction

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 1304-1313

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02179

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC (Canada)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inclusions in a brush disrupt the brush structure and introduce effective particle-particle interactions mediated by the brush. The brush promotes clustering of inclusions when the grafting point is mobile, while inclusions tend to be dispersed when the grafting point is fixed. These findings have biological implications for interactions between antimicrobial peptides and bacterial lipopolysaccharides, as well as clustering of integrin on cancerous cell membranes.
Inclusions in a brush are entropically disfavored, as they constrain the surrounding brush chains and limit possible chain conformations. As a result, polymer brushes can be used in lubrication or as biological coatings against toxic molecules. Here, we study the interaction of nanoparticles with a brush using self-consistent field theory (SCFT). For a large particle compressing a brush, we reproduce the linear scaling of the repulsive potential 'Ion with the particle radius found previously using SCFT. Also, we find that this linearity gives way to a nonlinear (parabolic or cubic) dependence on the particle size for particles inserted deeply into the brush, consistent with earlier particle-based simulations. The insertion of particles disrupts the brush, changing polymer-particle interactions for subsequent nanoparticles, thus introducing effective particle-particle interactions mediated by the brush. When the grafting point is mobile in the plane of the grafting surface, our results suggest that the brush promotes clustering of inclusions. In contrast, inclusions tend to be dispersed when the grafting point is fixed. Finally, we discuss the biological implications of these findings: interactions of antimicrobial peptides with bacterial lipopolysaccharides and clustering of integrin on cancerous cell membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据