4.5 Article

A computational method for immune repertoire mining that identifies novel binders from different clonotypes, demonstrated by identifying anti-pertussis toxoid antibodies

期刊

MABS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2020.1869406

关键词

Antibody discovery; paratope; pertussis; pertussis toxoid; computational; immune repertoire mining; transgenic mouse; BCR-seq; paired sequencing

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/R015708/1]
  2. Gates Foundation
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a method for clustering antibodies with common antigen reactivity from different clonotypes using the antibody binding site. Experimental validation on a pertussis toxoid dataset confirmed that even the simplest abstraction of the antibody binding site is sufficient to group antigen-specific antibodies and provide additional information for conventional clonotype analysis.
Due to their shared genetic history, antibodies from the same clonotype often bind to the same epitope. This knowledge is used in immune repertoire mining, where known binders are used to search bulk sequencing repertoires to identify new binders. However, current computational methods cannot identify epitope convergence between antibodies from different clonotypes, limiting the sequence diversity of antigen-specific antibodies that can be identified. We describe how the antibody binding site, the paratope, can be used to cluster antibodies with common antigen reactivity from different clonotypes. Our method, paratyping, uses the predicted paratope to identify these novel cross clonotype matches. We experimentally validated our predictions on a pertussis toxoid dataset. Our results show that even the simplest abstraction of the antibody binding site, using only the length of the loops involved and predicted binding residues, is sufficient to group antigen-specific antibodies and provide additional information to conventional clonotype analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据