4.7 Article

Roles of protein, starch and sugar in the texture of sorghum biscuits

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110323

关键词

Breaking strength; Gluten-free; Kafirin; Starch; Sugar glass

资金

  1. South African National Research Foundation [85762]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the similar texture of sorghum biscuits to wheat biscuits is due to the sugar glass matrix present in both types of biscuits. Increasing water content in the dough increased the breaking strength and brittleness of sorghum biscuits, while increasing sucrose content also enhanced the breaking strength and brittleness of the biscuits.
This study investigated why biscuits made from sorghum flour have a similar texture to wheat biscuits despite the absence of gluten in sorghum dough. Electron microscopy revealed that the sorghum prolamin protein bodies remained intact in the sorghum biscuits and hence were unlikely to contribute to biscuit structure and texture. Polarized light microscopy showed that the starch granules in the sorghum biscuits were not gelatinized. Increasing dough water content increased the breaking strength and brittleness of sorghum biscuits. However, increasing the proportion of pre-gelatinized sorghum flour in the dough reduced the breaking strength of the sorghum biscuits, indicating that starch gelatinization weakened the biscuit structure. In contrast, increasing the sucrose content of the dough increased sorghum biscuit breaking strength and brittleness. At 20% sucrose (flour basis), the sorghum biscuits had similar breaking strength and brittleness to both Marie and sugar-snap wheat biscuits. DSC and X-ray diffractometry showed that the sugar in both the sorghum and wheat biscuits was in the glassy state and polarized light microscopy revealed that the sugar glass embedded or enveloped the sorghum biscuit flour particles. It is concluded that this sugar glass matrix is responsible for the strength and cohesiveness of the sorghum biscuits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据