4.5 Article

Experimental evidence of continuous isotropic-nematic phase transition in CdS nanowire nanocomposites of a nematic liquid crystal

期刊

LIQUID CRYSTALS
卷 48, 期 8, 页码 1151-1161

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02678292.2020.1849833

关键词

Dielectric anisotropy; isotropic; nematic phase transition; nematic liquid crystal; nanocomposites

资金

  1. DST, SERB [EMR/2016/005782]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By incorporating CdS nanowires into nematic liquid crystal, the weakly first-order discontinuous isotropic-nematic phase transition evolves into a continuous phase transition, affecting the dielectric permittivity and bulk conductivity. In addition, the nanocomposites show increased ionic conductivity with higher concentrations of CdS nanowires.
The calamitic nematic liquid crystal generally exhibits a discontinuous weakly first-order isotropic-nematic (I-N) phase transition. We found that, on the incorporation of CdS nanowire in the nematic host, the weakly first-order discontinuous I-N phase transition evolved as a continuous phase transition. The parallel and perpendicular components of dielectric permittivity and bulk conductivity of nanocomposites of CdS nanowires of a nematic liquid crystal (NLC) are found to follow continuous I-N phase transition in contrast to the discontinuous weakly first-order transition of the pure host nematic liquid crystal. This was further confirmed from scattered iGntensity measurements on the CdS nanocomposite samples of nematic liquid crystal in homeotropically aligned cells. Such measurements indicate a continuous phase transition for the nanocomposites of NLC having concentrations less than 0.2 wt% of CdS nanowires in NLC. The dielectric anisotropy, birefringence, threshold voltage of nanocomposites of CdS nanowire in a calamitic nematic liquid crystal with varying concentration of the nanowire have been measured. The ionic conductivity of nanocomposites of CdS nanowires of NLC increases with increasing concentration of CdS nanowires.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据