4.6 Article

Interactions of an Anionic Antimicrobial Peptide with Zinc(II): Application to Bacterial Mimetic Membranes

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 36, 期 48, 页码 14554-14562

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02306

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [1832167]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Chemistry [1832167] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While the majority of known antimicrobial peptides are cationic, a small number consist of short Asp-rich sequences that are anionic. These require metal ions to become biologically active. Here, we report the study of the zinc complexes of the peptide GADDDDD (GAD5), an antimicrobial peptide. Using a combination of dynamic light scattering (DLS), zeta-potential, infrared, Raman, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), we find that adding zinc ions to GAD5 forces it into a compact structure. Higher amounts of zinc ions favor a larger structure, possibly a dimer. SEM images show that zinc ions reduce the size of the fibrillar structures of GAD5. TGA curves show that the addition of zinc ions increases the thermal stability of the structure of the peptide. TGA and DSC indicate that the association of GAD5 with a zwitterionic phospholipid in the presence of zinc ions is the most stable. The stability of that complex is due to the presence of a sharp endothermic peak in the 200-300 degrees C range, suggesting the presence of interlamellar water that is essential to the stabilization of the structure. These results indicate that the Zn-GADS complex prefers the bacteria-mimicking neutral (zwitterionic) membranes. In the presence of negatively charged phospholipids, the complex remains unordered and unstable. In terms of mechanism of action, the Zn-GADS complex promotes a possible endocytic uptake with respect to neutral (zwitterionic) membranes while promoting membrane disruption by forming pores with respect to negatively charged phospholipids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据