期刊
LANCET ONCOLOGY
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 256-266出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30599-4
关键词
-
类别
This study aimed to evaluate the specific benefit of adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery compared with receiving cytoreductive surgery alone in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. The results showed no significant overall survival benefit after adding HIPEC, with more frequent postoperative late complications, suggesting that cytoreductive surgery alone should be prioritized as a treatment strategy.
Background The addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery has been associated with encouraging survival results in some patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases who were eligible for complete macroscopic resection. We aimed to assess the specific benefit of adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery compared with receiving cytoreductive surgery alone. Methods We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial at 17 cancer centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years and had histologically proven colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases, WHO performance status of 0 or 1, a Peritoneal Cancer Index of 25 or less, and were eligible to receive systemic chemotherapy for 6 months (ie, they had adequate organ function and life expectancy of at least 12 weeks). Patients in whom complete macroscopic resection or surgical resection with less than 1 mm residual tumour tissue was completed were randomly assigned (1:1) to cytoreductive surgery with or without oxaliplatin-based HIPEC. Randomisation was done centrally using minimisation, and stratified by centre, completeness of cytoreduction, number of previous systemic chemotherapy lines, and timing of protocol-mandated systemic chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin HIPEC was administered by the closed (360 mg/m(2)) or open (460 mg/m(2)) abdomen techniques, and systemic chemotherapy (400 mg/m(2) fluorouracil and 20 mg/m(2) folinic acid) was delivered intravenously 20 min before HIPEC. All individuals received systemic chemotherapy (of investigators' choosing) with or without targeted therapy before or after surgery, or both. The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received surgery. This trial is registed with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00769405, and is now completed. Findings Between Feb 11, 2008, and Jan 6, 2014, 265 patients were included and randomly assigned, 133 to the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 132 to the cytoreductive surgery alone group. After median follow-up of 63.8 months (IQR 53.0-77.1), median overall survival was 41.7 months (95% CI 36.2-53.8) in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 41.2 months (35.1-49.7) in the cytoreductive surgery group (hazard ratio 1.00 [95.37% CI 0.63-1.58]; stratified log-rank p=0.99). At 30 days, two (2%) treatment-related deaths had occurred in each group. Grade 3 or worse adverse events at 30 days were similar in frequency between groups (56 [42%] of 133 patients in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group vs 42 [32%] of 132 patients in the cytoreductive surgery group; p=0.083); however, at 60 days, grade 3 or worse adverse events were more common in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group (34 [26%] of 131 vs 20 [15%] of 130; p=0.035). Interpretation Considering the absence of an overall survival benefit after adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery and more frequent postoperative late complications with this combination, our data suggest that cytoreductive surgery alone should be the cornerstone of therapeutic strategies with curative intent for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Funding Institut National du Cancer, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique du Cancer, Ligue Contre le Cancer. Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据