4.5 Article

Immune Regulation, Maternal Infection, Vaccination, and Pregnancy Outcome

期刊

JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 199-206

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8854

关键词

pregnancy; infections; immunity; inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Approximately 12.5% of maternal deaths in the United States are caused by infectious diseases. The delicate immunological balance achieved during healthy pregnancies, where the mother's immune system tolerates the fetus but remains competent against infectious agents, can lead to increased susceptibility to infections during pregnancy. The disruption of this immunological homeostasis by infectious pathogens can result in detrimental health outcomes for both the mother and fetus.
About 12.5% of all maternal deaths in the United States are due to infectious causes. This proportion, although stable during the past three decades, represents an increase in infectious causes of mortality, as the overall mortality rate in U.S. pregnant women had increased steadily during that same period. During healthy pregnancies, a delicate immunological balance-in which a mother's immune system tolerates the semi-allogeneic fetus yet maintains immune competency against infectious agents-is achieved and maintained. This immunological paradigm, however, results in increased susceptibility to infectious diseases during pregnancy, particularly in later stages and during the early postpartum period. The inflammatory process induced by these infectious insults, as well as some noninfectious insults, occurring during pregnancy can disrupt this carefully achieved balance and, in turn, lead to a state of rampant inflammation, immune activation, and dysregulation with deleterious health outcomes for the mother and fetus. Elucidating mechanisms contributing to the disruption of this immunologic homeostasis, and its disruption by infectious pathogens, might offer opportunities for interventions to reduce maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据