4.3 Article

High Rate of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Due to Choir Practice in France at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic

期刊

JOURNAL OF VOICE
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.11.029

关键词

COVID-19-Infectious disease transmission; Cluster; Indoor choir practice; Act of singing; Asymp; tomatic infection carrier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This is a case study documenting a high transmission rate of SARS-CoV-2 associated with an indoor choir rehearsal in France at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Out of 27 participants, 19 were diagnosed with COVID-19 within 1 to 12 days after the rehearsal, with 36% requiring hospitalization and 21% being admitted to an ICU. The researchers recommend the suspension of indoor choir practices in the absence of effective barrier measures.
Objective. To document the case of a high transmission rate of SARS-CoV-2 generating a cluster linked to an indoor choir rehearsal hold at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in France.Method. Case study. Data were obtained via a questionnaire.Results. Twenty-seven participants, including 25 singers, 1 conductor and 1 accompanist attended a choir practice on March 12, 2020. The practice was indoor and took place in a non ventilated space of 45 m2. No choir member reported having been symptomatic for COVID-19 between March 2 and March 12.The mean age of the participants was 66.9 (range 35-86) years. The secondary attack rate was 70%: 19/27 participants were diagnosed with COVID-19 from 1 to 12 days after the rehearsal with a median of 5.1 days. Thirty-six percent of the cases needed a hospitalization (7/19), and 21% (4/19) were admitted to an ICU. The index cases were asymptomatic and possibly multiple.Conclusion. In the absence of valid barrier measures to prevent COVID-19 transmission, indoor choir practice should be suspended during the SARSCoV-2 surging phases. Transmission of the virus among gatherings from asymptomatic cases is a crucial issue and a main challenge to COVID-19 control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据