4.7 Article

PGM5-AS1 impairs miR-587-mediated GDF10 inhibition and abrogates progression of prostate cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02572-w

关键词

Prostate cancer; PGM5-AS1; MicroRNA-587; GDF10; Proliferation; Apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that PGM5-AS1 upregulates GDF10 gene expression by competitively binding to miR-587, thus inhibiting proliferation and accelerating apoptosis of PCa cells.
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a leading cause of cancer-related death in males. Aberrant expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has been implicated in various human malignancies, including PCa. This study aims to clarify the inhibitory role of human PGM5 antisense RNA 1 (PGM5-AS1) in the proliferation and apoptosis of PCa cells. Methods: The regulatory network of PGM5-AS1/microRNA-587 (miR-587)/growth and differentiation factor 10 (GDF10) axis was examined by dual-luciferase reporter gene assay, RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation, and RNA pull down assay. We manipulated the expression of PGM5-AS1, miR-587 and GDF10 by transducing expression vectors, mimic, inhibitor, or short hairpin RNA into PCa cells, thus establishing their functions in cell proliferation and apoptosis. Additionally, we measured the tumorigenicity of PCa cells xenografted in nude mice. Results: PGM5-AS1 is expressed at low levels in PCa cell lines. Forced overexpression of PGM5-AS1 restricted proliferation and facilitated apoptosis of PCa cells, manifesting in suppressed xenograft tumor growth in nude mice. Notably, PGM5-AS1 competitively bound to miR-587, which directly targets GDF10. We further validated that the anti-cancer role of PGM5-AS1 in PCa cells was achieved by binding to miR-587 to promote the expression of GDF10. Conclusion: PGM5-AS1 upregulates GDF10 gene expression by competitively binding to miR-587, thus inhibiting proliferation and accelerating apoptosis of PCa cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据