4.4 Article

The Role of Substrate Preheating on the Adhesion Strength of Cold-Sprayed Soft Particles on Hard Substrates

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL SPRAY TECHNOLOGY
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 655-667

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11666-020-01148-w

关键词

cold spray; induction heating; soft; hard combination; substrate preheating

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that substrate preheating in induction heating cold spray significantly enhances adhesion strength, increases bonded area, and alters the characteristics of failure mode.
Induction heating cold spray has recently been proposed as a new hybrid additive manufacturing technique and a possible solution to avoid the delamination of soft material coatings from hard substrates. This process relies on the combined contributions of substrate preheating and in situ coating heating as a result of the alternating electromagnetic field applied that generates eddy currents. However, fundamental studies at the micron-scale explaining the role of substrate preheating on the adhesion strength of the soft/hard (particle/substrate) material combination are scarce. Therefore, this study focuses on investigating the role of substrate preheating in induction heating cold spray on bond formation and adhesion strength at the individual particle level by removing sprayed single soft particles (pure aluminum) from hard substrates (Ti-6Al-4V) using the splat adhesion test. Substrate preheating improved the splat adhesion strength by 30% and the bonded area sixfold. In addition, due to an increase in the splat adhesion energy, the failure mode changed from brittle to a more ductile type of failure when the initial substrate surface temperature was increased from 25 to 600 degrees C. These results are attributed to a combined effect of a more effective oxide removal on the substrate surface due to enhanced localized deformation, and a local heat treatment process in the vicinity of the particle/substrate interface that induces recovery, and, possibly, static recrystallization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据