4.6 Article

Electrochemical corrosion behavior and mechanical properties of Ti-Ag biomedical alloys obtained by two powder metallurgy processing routes

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104063

关键词

Ti-Ag; Powder metallurgy; Mechanical alloying; Corrosion; Biomaterial

资金

  1. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO 2016/040, APOSTD/2017/051]
  2. European Commission via FEDER funds
  3. Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [RTI2018-097810-B-I00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Titanium is frequently used as a biomaterial and the importance of Ti-Ag alloys has increased thanks to the antibacterial behavior of silver. In this study, Ti-Ag alloys (5, 10 and 15 wt% Ag) were obtained by two different powder metallurgy routes: blended elemental (BE) and mechanical alloying (MA). The influence of the powder mixture methodology on both microstructure and electrochemical behavior was analyzed. Powders were com-pacted at 600 and 900 MPa, respectively, and sintered at high vacuum for 3 h at 950 degrees C. The obtained Ti-Ag alloys were microstructurally characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and mechanically tested by hardness and bending tests. Electrochemical tests were run using a three-electrode cell in an artificial Fusayama saliva solution. Open-Circuit Potential (OCP), polarization curves, potentiostatic tests and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) techniques were employed to evaluate the corrosion resistance of the studied Ti-Ag alloys. The initial characteristics of powders before sintering and after blend/alloying modified the electrochemical behavior of the Ti-Ag-sintered alloys and were determined. The samples obtained with the BE powders better resisted corrosion than the MA samples, and this behavior was directly related to the quantity and distribution of intermetallic Ti2Ag. A large quantity of intermetallics present on both the edge and inside grains reduced the corrosion resistance of TiAg alloys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据