4.4 Article

Delayed blow-up for chemotaxis models with local sensing

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1112/jlms.12420

关键词

35K51; 35D30; 35B65; 35Q92; 92C17 (primary)

资金

  1. DAAD-MESRI-MEAE PROCOPE [42526SM]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes a chemotaxis model based on local sensing mechanism, different from the traditional gradient sensing mechanism, where the delay of explosion in the supercritical mass case is observed to be infinite time. Through mathematical proof, the global existence of weak solutions is established, and the regularity and uniqueness of solutions are studied. The key difference is the (H1)'-bound in the equation structure, leading to a lower bound on entropy, contrasting with the minimal Keller-Segel model.
The aim of this paper is to analyze a model for chemotaxis based on a local sensing mechanism instead of the gradient sensing mechanism used in the celebrated minimal Keller-Segel model. The model we study has the same entropy as the minimal Keller-Segel model, but a different dynamics to minimize this entropy. Consequently, the conditions on the mass for the existence of stationary solutions or blow-up are the same; however, we make the interesting observation that with the local sensing mechanism the blow-up in the case of supercritical mass is delayed to infinite time. Our observation is made rigorous from a mathematical point of view via a proof of global existence of weak solutions for arbitrary large masses and space dimension. The key difference of our model to the minimal Keller-Segel model is that the structure of the equation allows for a duality estimate that implies a bound on the (H1)'-norm of the solutions, which can only grow with a square-root law in time. This additional (H1)'-bound implies a lower bound on the entropy, which contrasts markedly with the minimal Keller-Segel model for which it is unbounded from below in the supercritical case. Besides, regularity and uniqueness of solutions are also studied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据