4.2 Article

Pre-treatment of landfill leachate by biochar for the reduction of chemical oxygen demand: the effect of treatment time, temperature and biochar dose

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE IRANIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 1729-1739

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13738-020-02145-0

关键词

Landfill leachate; Biochar; Chemical oxygen demand; Box-Behnken design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that biochar had a significant effect on reducing the COD of landfill leachate, with the optimal conditions being 140 minutes treatment time, 31°C temperature, and 1.95g biochar dosage achieving a 75.5% COD removal rate. The regenerated biochar sample showed a COD removal rate of 71%, indicating its potential for multiple uses.
Landfill leachate is the liquid formed by the decomposition of waste in the landfill and infiltration of water through that waste. It contains high concentrations of ammonia and organic contaminants (measured in terms of chemical oxygen demand, COD). Biochar, produced from woody residues separated from municipal waste, was used for the reduction of COD of the leachate. The produced biochar was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area analysis and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. By following response surface methodology and specifically the Box-Behnken design, the optimum conditions and effects of time, temperature and biochar dosage were determined. It was stated that biochar dosage was the most influential factor, whereas adsorption time and temperature had a lesser effect on the process. The optimum conditions for COD removal from the leachate were the following: treatment time 140 min, temperature 31 degrees C and biochar dosage of 1.95 g, where a 75.5% COD removal was achieved. At these conditions, the NH4+-N concentration was reduced by 23%. The spent biochar sample was regenerated by successively washing it with HF, ethanol and NaOH, and the regenerated sample achieved COD removal rates of 71%, indicating the potential for multiple uses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据