4.7 Article

Comparison of sintering behavior and reinforcing mechanisms between 3Y-TZP/Al2O3(w) and 12Ce-TZP/Al2O3(w) composites: Combined effects of lanthanide stabilizer and Al2O3 whisker length

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 706-718

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.08.026

关键词

Zirconia; Whiskers; Stabilizer; Sintering; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2013G061]
  2. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Green Building Materials [2019GBM03]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201904010357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study systematically compared the effects of different whisker lengths on the Al2O3 whisker-reinforced 3Y-TZP and 12Ce-TZP composites, revealing that changes in whisker length can impact the toughening and strengthening results.
The densification behavior, microstructural development, toughening and strengthening mechanisms of Al2O3 whisker-reinforced 3Y-TZP and 12Ce-TZP composites were systematically and comparatively investigated with varying whisker lengths. Compared with 3Y-TZP/A(w) composites, the presence of a Ce-Al-Si-O amorphous phase, caused by the addition of Al2O3 whiskers, promoted the densification and grain growth of 12Ce-TZP/A(w) composites. Crack deflection and bridging are proposed as the primary toughening mechanisms for 3Y-TZP/A(w) composites, while the t-m martensitic transformation would dominate the toughening and strengthening processes of 12Ce-TZP/Aw composites. Changes in Al2O3 whisker length would vary the distributions of internal stress and amorphous phase within the ceria-stabilized ZrO2 matrix, and hence affect the toughening and strengthening results. It indicates that effective toughening and strengthening of the Al2O3 whisker-reinforced TZP composites can be achieved by taking advantage of collaborative engineering control on the reinforcement morphology and the interface chemistry/structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据