4.6 Review

Review-Recent Advancements of ZnO/rGO Nanocomposites (NCs) for Electrochemical Gas Sensor Applications

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/abdee7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Impact-Oriented Interdisciplinary Research Grant [IIRG018-2019]
  2. NANOCAT RU Grant 2019
  3. Southeast Asia-Taiwan Universities (SATU) Joint Research Grant [ST012-2019, ST016-2020]
  4. Faculty Research Grant [GPF017A-2018]
  5. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [FP023-2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc oxide/reduced graphene oxide composites have shown promising applications in electrochemical gas sensors due to their excellent electrochemical properties and high sensitivity. Challenges still remain in the fabrication and utilization of gas sensors operating at low temperatures.
Zinc oxide (ZnO)/rGO (reduced graphene oxide) composites have recently gained much interest in electrochemical gas sensor devices due to their fascinating electrochemical properties such as active surface sites, high surface area to volume ratios and high carrier large mobility. ZnO is a significant gas sensing material due to its excellent response towards oxidizing/reducing gases, easy preparation, and less toxicity. At the same time, graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide-based sensors exhibited high surface area, and the presence of surface functional groups facilitated gas sensing properties. The synergistic effect of ZnO/rGO improved sensing properties and binding stability with macromolecules, thus making them potential candidates for the design of gas sensor devices. However, the fabrication and utilization of gas sensors operating at the low-temperature condition is still a significant hurdle. This review encompasses the recent advancements of ZnO/rGO nanostructures synthesis, studying nanocomposite interactions in various gas sensing applications. This study also proposes future outlooks on the ZnO-rGO gas sensors high selectivity and sensitivity for gas detection at low working temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据