4.4 Article

Physical activity and cognitive function in adults with multiple sclerosis: an integrative review

期刊

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
卷 39, 期 19, 页码 1909-1920

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1213900

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; cognition; cognitive function; exercise; physical activity; review

资金

  1. International Organization of Multiple Sclerosis Nurses
  2. National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health [F31 NR014601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To identify and synthesize the research evidence concerning (1) the relationship between physical activity and cognitive performance in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) and (2) to review the reported effects of physical activity interventions on neurocognitive performance conducted in this population. Methods: Relevant peer-reviewed journal articles were identified by searching PubMed, PsychINFO, and SPORTDiscus through May 2016. Full-text articles meeting the inclusion criteria were evaluated for quality using tools developed by the National Institutes of Health. Studies deemed to be of poor quality were excluded from the review. Results: Nineteen studies meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria were analyzed. Nine studies reported significant relationships between higher levels of physical activity or cardiorespiratory fitness and measures of cognitive function. Data extracted from 10 physical activity intervention studies reported mixed results on the effectiveness of physical activity to improve selected domains of cognitive function in persons with MS. Conclusion: Although correlational studies provide evidence to support a linkage between physical activity and cognitive function in persons with MS, this linkage is confounded by factors that may have influenced the studies' results. Evidence derived from intervention studies that could support a positive effect of physical activity on cognition in persons with MS is equivocal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据