4.8 Article

Rapid Assembly of Tetrasubstituted Furans via Pummerer-Type Rearrangement

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 143, 期 2, 页码 1216-1223

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c12194

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund FWF [P31023-NBL, M2005]
  2. Center for Molecular Biosciences CMBI
  3. Tyrolean Science Fund TWF [UNI-0404/2340, F.16642/5-2019]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [M2005, P31023] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A powerful method for the synthesis of tetrasubstituted furans has been developed, involving the regioselective ring-opening of 2,5-dihydrothiophenes followed by an oxidative cyclization. The potential for organic synthesis is highlighted by the total synthesis of bisabolene sesquiterpenoids using the obtained furans. Mechanistic experiments and computational studies revealed an unprecedented Pummerer-type rearrangement in the reaction process.
Despite the many methods available for the synthesis of furans, few methods remain that allow for the custom-made assembly of fully substituted furans. Here we report a powerful protocol to rapidly construct tetrasubstituted, orthogonally functionalized furans under mild reaction conditions. The developed method involves the regioselective ring-opening of readily available 2,5-dihydrothiophenes followed by an oxidative cyclization to provide the heterocycle. The selective oxidation at sulfur is promoted by N-chlorosuccinimide as an inexpensive reagent and proceeds at ambient temperature in high yield within 30 min. The obtained furans serve as exceptionally versatile intermediates and were shown to participate in a series of valuable postmodifications. The fate of the initial sulfonium intermediate was investigated by mechanistic experiments, and computational studies revealed the existence of an unprecedented Pummerer-type rearrangement. The potential for organic synthesis is highlighted by the total synthesis of bisabolene sesquiterpenoids (pleurotins A, B, and D).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据