4.5 Article

Acoustic radiation force and torque on spheroidal particles in an ideal cylindrical chambera)

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 149, 期 1, 页码 285-295

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0003046

关键词

-

资金

  1. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development-CNPq [308357/2019-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article theoretically investigates the acoustic radiation force and torque on a small spheroidal particle in a nonviscous fluid inside an ideal cylindrical chamber. Analytical expressions for the radiation force and torque caused by an acoustic wave of arbitrary shape are presented, and the behavior of an elongated metallic microspheroid in a half-wavelength acoustofluidic chamber is analyzed. The results show alignment and translational motion effects on the microspheroid caused by the radiation torque and force.
In this article, the acoustic radiation force and torque exerted on a small spheroidal particle immersed in a nonviscous fluid inside an ideal cylindrical chamber is theoretically investigated. The ideal chamber comprises a hard top and bottom (rigid boundary condition) and a soft or hard lateral wall. By assuming that the particle is much smaller than the acoustic wavelength, analytical expressions of the radiation force and torque caused by an acoustic wave of arbitrary shape are presented. Unlike previous results, these expressions are given relative to a fixed laboratory frame. The model is showcased for analyzing the behavior of an elongated metallic microspheroid (with a 10:1 aspect ratio) in a half-wavelength acoustofluidic chamber with a diameter of a few millimeters. The results show that the radiation torque aligns the microspheroid along the nodal plane, and the radiation force causes a translational motion with a speed of up to one body length per second. Finally, the implications of this study on propelled nanorods by ultrasound are discussed. (C) 2021 Acoustical Society of America.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据