4.4 Article

Utilization of telehealth in paediatric genome-wide sequencing: Health services implementation issues in the CAUSES Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 318-327

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1357633X20982737

关键词

Telehealth; telemedicine; virtual health; genome-wide sequencing; genetic counselling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome-wide sequencing is revolutionizing the care of pediatric patients with rare diseases, with genetic counselling recommended for families undergoing this procedure. Telehealth has enabled access to genome-wide sequencing for families in remote areas, but has led to delays in sample accrual.
Introduction Genome-wide sequencing (exome or whole genome) is transforming the care and management of paediatric patients with a rare disease because of its diagnostic capabilities. Genome-wide sequencing is most effective when both parents and the child are sequenced as a trio. Genetic counselling is recommended for all families considering genome-wide sequencing. Although telehealth is well established in genetic counselling for hereditary cancer and prenatal genetics, its use with genome-wide sequencing has not been well studied. The CAUSES Clinic at BC Children's and Women's Hospitals was a translational paediatric trio-based genome-wide sequencing initiative. Pre-test genetic counselling via telehealth (at a clinical site near the family's residence) was offered to families who had been previously evaluated by a clinical geneticist. We report on the first 300 families seen in the CAUSES clinic and compare health services implementation issues of families seen via telehealth versus on-site. Methods Demographics, cost to families (travel and time), time to first appointment, complete trio sample accrual and diagnostic rates were studied. Results Of the 300 patients, 58 (19%) were seen via telehealth and 242 (81%) were seen on-site for pre-test counselling. The mean time to completion of accrual of trio samples in the telehealth group was 56.3 (standard deviation +/- 87.3) days versus 18.9 (standard deviation +/- 62.4) days in the onsite group (p < 2.2 x 10(-16)). The mean per-family estimated actual or potential travel/time cost savings were greater in the telehealth group (Can$987; standard deviation = Can$1151) than for those seen on-site (Can$305; standard deviation = Can$589) (p = 0.0004). Conclusions Telehealth allowed for access to genome-wide sequencing for families in remote communities and for them to avoid significant travel and time costs; however, there was a significant delay to accrual of the complete trio samples in the telehealth group, impacting on time of result reporting and delaying diagnoses for families for whom genome-wide sequencing was diagnostic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据