4.6 Article

The relationship between trunk rotation and shot speed when performing ice hockey wrist shots

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
卷 39, 期 9, 页码 1001-1009

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1853336

关键词

Ice hockey; motion capture; wrist shot; shooting; trunk; joint angle

资金

  1. Bauer Hockey Ltd.
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (CA) [CRDPJ 453725-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that trunk rotation angle is related to puck speed during ice hockey wrist shots, especially for recreational players. Coaches are encouraged to emphasize increasing trunk rotation during wrist shots to improve speed, particularly in recreational players.
There has been minimal work examining kinematics of ice hockey wrist shots. The objective was to determine if puck and blade speed were related to trunk rotation during wrist shots in elite and recreational players. Elite (n = 10) and recreational (n = 10) ice hockey players completed wrist shots while skating and from a stationary position on real ice. A 14 camera motion capture system collected kinematic data for the trunk, pelvis, stick, and puck. Dependent variables included peak puck and blade speeds. Independent variables included peak trunk rotation angles, trunk rotation range of motion (ROM), and group (elite vs. recreational). Hierarchical linear models compared relationships between dependent and independent variables for both skating and stationary wrist shots. Greater peak trunk rotation away from the net was related (p < 0.05) to faster puck and blade speeds for skating and stationary wrist shots. This relationship was stronger in the recreational group for skating wrist shots (p < 0.01). Greater trunk rotation ROM was related (p = 0.01) to faster puck and blade speeds for the skating wrist shots only. Coaches should encourage players to increase trunk rotation away from the net during wrist shots, especially in recreational players.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据