4.5 Review

Applications of porous frameworks in solid-phase microextraction

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 44, 期 6, 页码 1231-1263

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202001172

关键词

covalent organic frameworks; layered double hydroxides; metal-organic frameworks; porous frameworks; porous silica frameworks

资金

  1. Tarbiat Modares University
  2. Lunds Universitet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous frameworks, attractive solid materials assembled by interconnection of molecules and ions, are gaining attention due to their high stability, well-defined pore size, and large surface area, making them suitable for use as extraction phases in sample pretreatment. Solid-phase microextraction, a subclass of sample preparation techniques, has different configurations introduced to adapt to various environments and analytical instruments. This review investigates the theoretical aspects and different modes of solid-phase microextraction methods.
Porous frameworks are a term of attracting solid materials assembled by interconnection of molecules and ions. These trendy materials due to high chemical and thermal stability, well-defined pore size and structure, and high effective surface area gained attention to employ as extraction phase in sample pretreatment methods before analytical analysis. Solid-phase microextraction is an important subclass of sample preparation technique that up to now different configurations of this method have been introduced to get adaptable with different environments and analytical instruments. In this review, theoretical aspect and different modes of solid-phase microextraction method are investigated. Different classes of porous frameworks and their applications as extraction phase in the proposed microextraction method are evaluated. Types and features of supporting substrates and coating procedures of porous frameworks on them are reviewed. At the end, the prospective and the challenges ahead in this field are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据