4.7 Article

ACE-2-Derived Biomimetic Peptides for the Inhibition of Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 1296-1303

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00686

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; hACE-2; COVID-19; peptide inhibitor; molecular dynamics

资金

  1. IISER Berhampur

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A peptide inhibitor with stronger interaction with the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 has been discovered, potentially aiding in containing the virus. Peptides generated by mutating non-interacting residues of hACE-2 show higher efficacy in interaction with the spike protein.
SARS-CoV-2, a novel coronavirus causing overwhelming death and infection worldwide, has emerged as a pandemic. Compared to its predecessor SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 is more infective for being highly contagious and exhibiting tighter binding with host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE-2). The entry of the virus into host cells is mediated by the interaction of its spike protein with hACE-2. Thus, a peptide that has a resemblance to hACE-2 but can overpower the spike protein-hACE-2 interaction will be a potential therapeutic to contain this virus. The non-interacting residues in the receptor-binding domain of hACE-2 have been mutated to generate a library of 136 new peptides. Out of this library, docking and virtual screening discover seven peptides that can exert a stronger interaction with the spike protein than hACE-2. A peptide derived from simultaneous mutation of all the non-interacting residues of hACE-2 yields almost three-fold stronger interaction than hACE-2 and thus turns out here to be the best peptide inhibitor of the novel coronavirus. The binding of the best peptide inhibitor with the spike protein is explored further by molecular dynamics, free energy, and principal component analysis, which demonstrate its efficacy compared to hACE-2. The delivery of the screened inhibitors with nanocarriers like metal-organic frameworks will be worthy of further consideration to boost their efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据