4.5 Article

The more the merrier? Chinese government R&D subsidies, dependence, and firm innovation performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 289-310

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12564

关键词

innovation; government subsidies; organizational structure

资金

  1. China Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science [20YJC790099]
  2. Central University of Finance and Economics Young Scholar Funding [QJJ1808]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71873136]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Government R&D subsidies have mixed impacts on innovation performance of firms, with high government resource dependency diverting attention resources and resulting in declining innovation performance. However, technology alliances and employee feedback systems can mitigate these negative effects.
With the understanding that innovation and high technology industries are essential for sustained economic development, government R&D subsidies have become ubiquitous. However, existing studies on the impact of R&D subsidies have found mixed or conflicting results. Insights from resource dependence theory (RDT) and the Attention-Based View (ABV) help account for these discrepancies. This study of Chinese high technology firms using the Innovation-Oriented Firms Database from the Ministry of Science and Technology, finds an inverted U-shaped relationship between R&D subsidies and innovation performance. The article shows that high government resource dependency, expressed through high percentage of R&D spending coming from government subsidies, diverts attention resources in recipient firms and results in declining innovation performance. The article then tests the impacts of different managerial responses on the dependency-innovation relationship and find that technology alliances and employee feedback systems mitigate these negative effects. These findings have implications for government innovation policies and firm-level responses to those policies: government subsidy policies have limits to their effectiveness and firms have strategic options for capitalizing on government resources without sacrificing innovativeness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据