4.6 Article

Dedicated setup to isolate plasma catalysis mechanisms

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/abd65b

关键词

plasma catalysis; rf plasmas; plasma chemistry

资金

  1. DFG (German Science Foundation) [SFB 1316]
  2. BMBF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasma catalysis combines plasma and catalysis to achieve efficient molecule conversion, providing flexibility in operating parameters and feed gases. Understanding the mechanisms behind plasma catalysis is challenging due to the complex interactions between plasma, gas-phase chemistry, and surface reactions. Researchers have developed a robust setup using a parallel-plate atmospheric-pressure plasma jet for analysis and application.
Plasma catalysis, the combination of plasma and catalysis, is used to achieve efficient molecule conversion, supporting the flexibility of operating parameters and feed gases. By combining plasmas with conventional thermal catalysis, the temperature windows may be changed and the process may be made insensitive to catalyst poisoning. However, understanding plasma catalysis mechanisms is extremely difficult, due to the strong coupling between plasma, gas-phase chemistry and surface. A multitude of reaction pathways may be enhanced or reduced by the presence of a plasma that provides excited species as reaction partners. We developed a robust setup to analyse those processes, based on a parallel-plate atmospheric-pressure plasma jet that allows a plug flow design. The plasma chemistry is analysed by Fourier transform infrared absorption spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The electrodes in contact with the plasma are temperature controlled and can easily be replaced to apply a catalyst on top of them. The basic characteristics of the setup are discussed and three examples for its application are given: (a) the analysis of methane oxidation using the plug flow scheme; (b) the plasma catalytic conversion of CO2, and (c) the plasma catalytic conversion of methane in methane-oxygen mixtures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据