4.6 Article

Analytical solution of the SIR-model for the temporal evolution of epidemics. Part A: time-independent reproduction factor

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/abc65d

关键词

statistical analysis; epidemic spreading; coronavirus; extrapolation; SIR epidemic model; asymptotic behavior; analytic approximant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We revisit the susceptible-infectious-recovered/removed (SIR) model which is one of the simplest compartmental models. Many epidemological models are derivatives of this basic form. While an analytic solution to the SIR model is known in parametric form for the case of a time-independent infection rate, we derive an analytic solution for the more general case of a time-dependent infection rate, that is not limited to a certain range of parameter values. Our approach allows us to derive several exact analytic results characterizing all quantities, and moreover explicit, non-parametric, and accurate analytic approximants for the solution of the SIR model for time-independent infection rates. We relate all parameters of the SIR model to a measurable, usually reported quantity, namely the cumulated number of infected population and its first and second derivatives at an initial time t = 0, where data is assumed to be available. We address the question of how well the differential rate of infections is captured by the Gauss model (GM). To this end we calculate the peak height, width, and position of the bell-shaped rate analytically. We find that the SIR is captured by the GM within a range of times, which we discuss in detail. We prove that the SIR model exhibits an asymptotic behavior at large times that is different from the logistic model, while the difference between the two models still decreases with increasing reproduction factor. This part A of our work treats the original SIR model to hold at all times, while this assumption will be relaxed in part B. Relaxing this assumption allows us to formulate initial conditions incompatible with the original SIR model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据