4.8 Article

Highly Luminescent CsPbBr3@Cs4PbBr6 Nanocrystals and Their Application in Electroluminescent Emitters

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 11, 期 23, 页码 10196-10202

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03142

关键词

-

资金

  1. Advanced Research Center of Green Materials Science and Technology from The Featured Area Research Center Program within Ministry of Education [107L9006]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [MOST 109-2113-M-002020-MY3, MOST 107-2113-M-002-008-MY3, MOST 1073017-F-002-001]
  3. JST-CREST, Japan [JPMJCR16N3]
  4. International Collaborative Research Program of the Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University [2020-35]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zero-dimensional perovskite nanocrystals (NCs) are becoming the most attractive material due to their excellent optical performance and better stability compared with high-dimensional perovskite. However, their application in electroluminescent (EL) emitters for high-quality displays is still limited. In this work, we successfully achieved CsPbBr3@Cs4PbBr6 NCs around 13.9 +/- 0.2 nm by using the hot-injection method. Additional SnBr2 was mixed in the PbBr2 precursor to provide extra Br- ions and reduce the excessive amount of Pb2+ ions to promote the formation of CsPbBr3@Cs4PbBr6. Time resolution photoluminescence analysis indicated that the green emission of our CsPbBr3@Cs4PbBr6NCs originated from the embedded CsPbBr3NCs, which corresponds to our previous research. The Cs4PbBr6 crystals passivated the surface of CsPbBr3NCs, resulting in the absence of trions for the high photoluminescence quantum yield. The as-synthesized CsPbBr3@Cs4PbBr6NCs were used to fabricate quantum dot light-emitting diode (QLED) devices with the highest current efficiency of 4.89 cd/A. This is the best performance of the CsPbBr3@Cs4PbBr6-system QLED device, which reveals the great potential of CsPbBr3@Cs4PbBr6 NCs and will inspire further study of zero-dimensional perovskite composite NCs for EL emitters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据