4.6 Article

Enabling High Dielectric Response in PVDF/V2C MXene-TiO2 Composites Based on Nontypical V-F-Ti Bonding and Fermi-Level Overlapping Mechanisms

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 124, 期 50, 页码 27780-27789

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08444

关键词

-

资金

  1. General Project of Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Science and Technology Bureau [cstc2020jcyj-msxm0673]
  2. Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Munic ipal Education Commi ssion [KJQN201901417, KJQN201801409]
  3. Support Programme for Growth of Young Scientific Research Talents of Yangtze Normal University [0107/010721064]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High dielectric constant and breakdown strength are crucial for high-energy-density polymer/ceramic composites. Anatase-TiO2 with low dielectric constant and V2C MXene with high work function are not satisfactory fillers. In the present work, V2C-TiO2 hybrid filler was in situ synthesized, followed by fabricating poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)/V2C-TiO2 composites via solution cast. Compared with PVDF/TiO2 and PVDF/V2C composites, PVDF/V2C-TiO2 composites have an improved high dielectric constant, depressed low dielectric loss, and maintained high breakdown strength. High overall electric traits are ascribed to the synergy of conductive V2C and semiconductive TiO2. Outer and inner surfaces of V2C were ornament-combined by anatase-TiO2 particles having surface point defects as electron traps, contributing to low interface leakage conduction. Through density functional theory (DFT) calculations, nontypical V-F-Ti-bonding-induced dipole enhancement and Fermi-level (E-F) overlapping-induced high electron localization mechanisms improve the dielectric response. Ternary composite with 10 wt % hybrid filler exhibits a dielectric constant of similar to 99, a dielectric loss of similar to 0.24 at 1 kHz, and a breakdown strength of similar to 189 MV/m. This work might enable large-scale preparation of promising polymer/MXene composite dielectrics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据