4.6 Article

Angular Goos-Hanchen Shift Sensor Using a Gold Film Enhanced by Surface Plasmon Resonance

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 125, 期 1, 页码 451-458

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c09373

关键词

-

资金

  1. KAKENHI, Japan [20H02625]
  2. JST CREST, Japan [J0119011]
  3. University of the Philippines Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs thru its Enhanced Creative Work and Research Grant (ECWRG)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H02625] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) was used to enhance the angular Goos-Hanchen (GH) shift. By focusing the incident beam to a small beam waist, a significant increase in the angular GH shift was induced, while the spatial GH shift was negligible. Despite decreased efficiency in surface plasmon excitation due to the focused geometry, a large enhancement in the angular GH shift was demonstrated.
We demonstrate the surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-enhanced angular Goos-Hanchen (GH) shift. Typical SPR-enhanced GH shift measurements make use of loosely collimated beams, which enhances only the spatial GH shift (Delta(GH)). Unlike this scheme, we focused the incident beam to a small beam waist to induce enhancement in the angular GH shift (Theta(GH)). Although this makes Delta(GH) negligible, the enhancement of Theta(GH) is much larger than the decrease in Delta(GH). In order to excite surface plasmons, we employ a Kretschmann configuration using a simple gold (Au) film on a substrate. We show that although the efficiency of surface plasmon excitation is decreased by the focused geometry, a significantly large Theta(GH) was induced. With the simultaneous measurement of reflectivity for SPR and the beam shift for the GH shift used in this work, we experimentally show the potential of measuring enhanced Theta(GH) toward sensing application when the Au film is exposed to local environmental changes even in the simplest thin film structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据