4.5 Review

Poly(dimethylsiloxane): A Sustainable Human Skin Alternative for Transdermal Drug Delivery Prediction

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 110, 期 3, 页码 1018-1024

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.11.028

关键词

Drug delivery; Permeability; Polymers; Transdermal; Skin

资金

  1. Petroleum Technology Development Fund, Nigeria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study discusses the use of PDMS as a sustainable alternative to skin for pharmaceutical analysis, enhancing the ability to predict permeability for hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs. Optimizations and limitations related to transdermal drug delivery research are documented and reviewed.
Despite the advantages of transdermal drug delivery (TDD), which makes it a fast-growing area of research in pharmaceutics, numerous challenges affect their development, which limits exploring the full potential of this alternate drug delivery route. In trying to address one of these problems, it is strongly believed that the need for a sustainable skin alternative is paramount. Efforts made in an attempt to provide a sustainable alternative to employing skin in pharmaceutical analysis, by better utilising a polymer membrane, namely poly(dimethylsiloxane), also known as PDMS are discussed. Several combined properties of this polymer, which includes its relative stability in comparison with human skin, make it a good candidate for the replacement of skin. Modifications undertaken to this polymer membrane (to create an enhanced skin mimic for permeation analysis) are discussed and reviewed in this paper, including the improved ability to predict permeability for both hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs. Optimisations related to studying TDD including limitations encountered are also documented and reviewed. It is hoped that such developments in this field will ultimately lead to researchers replacing skin with optimised polymer-based alternatives to predict transdermal drug delivery. (C) 2020 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据