4.7 Article

Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Physiology and Pathophysiology of the Nervous System

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 834-844

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1656-20.2020

关键词

liquid-liquid phase separation; membraneless organelle; local protein synthesis; synapse; neurodegenerative diseases

资金

  1. Kyoto University SPIRITS 2019
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [18H04733, 18H05434]
  3. Simons Foundation [510178]
  4. Research Grant Council of Hong Kong [AoE-M09-12, C6004-17G]
  5. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0020/2019]
  6. Academy of Medical Sciences Springboard Fellowship
  7. University of Dundee start-up grant
  8. Telethon Career Award [TCP15011]
  9. Alzheimer Association's Grant [AARG-17-505136]
  10. Fujitsu Laboratories
  11. Dwango
  12. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H04733, 18H05434] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LLPS is a new mechanism for cellular compartmentalization, recently gaining attention in neurobiology. It typically occurs between macromolecules with multivalent interactions, aiding in the formation of membraneless organelles.
Molecules within cells are segregated into functional domains to form various organelles. While some of those organelles are delimited by lipid membranes demarcating their constituents, others lack a membrane enclosure. Recently, liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) revolutionized our view of how segregation of macromolecules can produce membraneless organelles. While the concept of LLPS has been well studied in the areas of soft matter physics and polymer chemistry, its significance has only recently been recognized in the field of biology. It occurs typically between macromolecules that have multivalent interactions. Interestingly, these features are present in many molecules that exert key functions within neurons. In this review, we cover recent topics of LLPS in different contexts of neuronal physiology and pathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据