4.7 Article

Epileptic seizures in multiple sclerosis: prevalence, competing causes and diagnostic accuracy

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 268, 期 5, 页码 1721-1727

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-10346-z

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Epilepsy; Seizures; Comorbidity; Epidemiology

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study described a cohort of patients with both MS and epileptic seizures, finding that a significant percentage of MS patients with seizures had competing causes at the time of the first seizure. A detailed diagnostic setup including patient history, EEG, and MRI is recommended for evaluation and treatment decisions.
Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is accompanied by an increased risk of epileptic seizures, but data with a detailed description of the competing causes are lacking. Methods We aimed to describe a cohort of patients with both MS and epileptic seizures in a retrospective, population-based study. Results We included 59 out of 2285 MS patients who had at least one epileptic seizure. Out of them, 22 had seizures before the diagnosis of MS, whereas epileptic seizures occurred after MS diagnosis in 37 patients, resulting in a total prevalence of epileptic seizures in MS of 2.6%. Competing causes could be found in 50.8% (30/59) of all patients, with 40.9% (9/22) compared to 56.8% (21/37) of the MS patients with seizures before vs after MS diagnosis. The main alternative causes were traumatic brain injury and cerebral ischemia accounting for more than 30% of the patients, with no difference between the subgroups. 33.3% and 55.6% of MS patients with seizures before/after MS diagnosis had documented pathological EEG alterations. Conclusion A remarkable percentage of MS patients with epileptic seizures do have alternative competing causes at the time of the first seizure. A detailed diagnostic setup including patient history, EEG and MRI is recommended in the evaluation and choice for the best treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据