4.7 Article

Study on photocatalytic degradation of phenol by BiOI/Bi2WO6 layered heterojunction synthesized by hydrothermal method

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114965

关键词

Photocatalysis; Heterojunction; Phenol; BiOI/Bi2WO6

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21276146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel BiOI/Bi2WO6 heterojunction photocatalyst responsive to visible light was synthesized, exhibiting high photocatalytic activity and stability. The main active substance was identified as holes, and the enhancement of photocatalytic activity was attributed to the separation of electrons and holes, inhibiting their recombination. This study provides a new approach for the visible light degradation of organic pollutants.
In this paper, a novel BiOI/Bi2WO6 heterojunction photocatalyst that responds to visible light was synthesized by hydrothermal method. The photocatalyst is a flower-like layered microsphere structure composed of many nanosheets. The influence of the molar ratio of BiOI and Bi2WO6 on heterojunction photocatalyst activity was investigated. compared with pure BiOI and pure Bi2WO6, BiOI/Bi2WO6 which formed heterojunctions showed higher photocatalytic activity, among which BiOI/Bi2WO6(2,1) had the highest photocatalytic activity for phenol. Five cycles of photocatalytic experiments, it was found that the photocatalytic performance of the sample did not significantly reduced, indicating that the photocatalyst has good stability and reusability. In addition, the enhancement mechanism of photocatalytic activity was explored, and it was proved that hole was the main active substance, and the enhancement of photocatalytic activity was mainly since the generated electrons and holes are separated in the two semiconductor materials, inhibiting their recombination. This study provides a new idea and method for visible light degradation of organic pollutants. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据