4.7 Review

Recent advances in removal techniques of Cr(VI) toxic ion from aqueous solution: A comprehensive review

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 329, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.115062

关键词

Hexavalent chromium; Removal process; Physical treatment; Chemical treatment; Adsorbent

资金

  1. UESTC
  2. Nanjing Forestry University [163020139, 164020818, 163020217, 16302023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High levels of hexavalent chromium contamination in water due to economic and industrial development pose a significant global environmental challenge, requiring efficient removal strategies. Various techniques are being studied and evaluated to enhance removal efficiency and bridge the gap between laboratory research and industrial applications.
Nowadays, due to the economic and industrial development, water contaminated with heavy metals is a significant concern and one of the acute global environmental problems. Hexavalent chromium is an important metal ion contaminant with high toxicity to bacteria, animals, plants and human, even at trace concentrations. It is potentially carcinogenic and mutagenic and can cause a serious threat to living organisms, so the efficient removal of Cr(VI) before releasing into the environment has become an essential issue from both biological and environmental perspectives. Currently, numerous techniques have been studied for Cr (VI) removal and its recycling from the wastewater. In the present study, the available Cr(VI) remediation strategies have been comprehensively reviewed for aqueous solutions and a broad range of recent research works have been evaluated. The major factors influencing the removal efficiency and mechanisms of various processes have also been briefly discussed. This can be useful for further developing Cr (VI) removal technologies to be more efficient and bridging the gap between laboratory findings and industrial applications. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据