4.3 Review

Microbial and nutritional influence on endocrine control of growth

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 66, 期 3, 页码 R67-R73

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/JME-20-0288

关键词

microbiome; IGF; growth factors; linear growth

资金

  1. La Fondation des Treilles
  2. French Ministry of Research
  3. Universite de Lyon
  4. ENS de Lyon
  5. CNRS
  6. FRM [FRM DEQ20180339196]
  7. ANR [ANR-18-CE15-0011-01]
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-18-CE15-0011] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the functional relationships between nutritional status, growth hormones, and gut microbiota, finding that undernutrition can affect the gut microbiota and potentially impact growth by modulating GH and IGF1 levels, while the GH/IGF1 axis may also regulate the gut microbiota.
The worrying number of children suffering from undernutrition and consequent stunting worldwide makes the understanding of the relationship between nutritional status and postnatal growth crucial. Moreover, it is now well established that undernourished children harbor an altered microbiota, correlating with impaired growth. In this review, we describe how murine models have been used to explore the functional relationships between endocrine regulation of growth, nutrition and gut microbiota. In numerous Mammalian species, postnatal growth is mainly regulated by the conserved GH/IGF1 somatotropic axis that acts through endocrine and paracrine pathways, notably enabling longitudinal bone growth. Recent studies have demonstrated that the microbiota effects on growth could involve a modulation of GH and IGF1 circulating levels. Besides, the GH/IGF1 somatotropic axis may regulate the gut microbiota composition and diversity. Studying the bidirectional relationship between growth hormones and the gut microbiome could therefore help developing microbiota-targeting therapies in order to reduce the long-term consequences of stunting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据