4.7 Article

FunRich enables enrichment analysis of OMICs datasets

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 433, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.166747

关键词

FunRich; gene set enrichment; vesiclepedia; heatmap; Venn diagram

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT180100333]
  2. CASS Foundation Medicine/Science Grant
  3. Australian Research Council [FT180100333] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-throughput methods for profiling various biological systems have become routine in research laboratories worldwide. The FunRich tool enables biologists to perform functional enrichment analysis on generated datasets with customizable visualizations. It allows users to update background databases from UniProt, supporting annotations from over 18 taxonomies.
High-throughput methods to profile the genome, transcriptome, proteome and metabolome of various systems has become a routine in multiple research laboratories around the world. Hence, to analyse and interpret these heterogenous datasets user-friendly bioinformatics tools are needed. Here, we discuss FunRich tool that enables biologists to perform functional enrichment analysis on the generated datasets. Users can perform enrichment analysis with a variety of background databases and have complete control in updating or modifying the content in most of the databases. Specifically, users can download and update the background database from UniProt at any time thereby allowing a robust background database that can support annotations from >18 taxonomies. Users can create customizable Venn diagrams, pie charts, bar graphs and heatmaps of publication quality for their datasets using FunRich (http://www.funrich.org). Overall, FunRich tool is user-friendly and enables users to perform various analysis on their datasets with minimal or no aid from bioinformaticians. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据