4.7 Article

Tocilizumab administration is associated with the reduction in biomarkers of coronavirus disease 2019 infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 93, 期 3, 页码 1832-1836

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26698

关键词

coronavirus disease 2019; COVID-19; immunomodulator; interleukin-6; tocilizumab

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Meta-analysis study suggests that tocilizumab treatment is effective in reducing the biomarkers of COVID-19 infection.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a significant impact on all aspects of life, with the number of death cases still increasing. Therefore, identification of potential treatment for reducing the severity of the disease is important. Currently, the data regarding the effectiveness of tocilizumab as treatment agents for COVID-19 infection is still conflicting. This study aims to give clear evidence regarding the potential benefit of tocilizumab in reducing the biomarkers of COVID-19 infection. We systematically searched the PubMed Central database using specific keywords related to our aims until July 24th, 2020. All articles published on COVID-19 and tocilizumab were retrieved. A total of 9 studies with a total of 577 patients were included in our analysis. Our meta-analysis showed that tocilizumab treatment is associated with reduction of C-reactive protein (mean difference [MD]: -106.69 mg/L [95% confidence interval [CI]: -146.90, -66.49 mg/L], p < .00001; I-2 = 98%, random-effect modeling), d-dimer (MD: -3.06 mg/L [95% CI: -5.81, -0.31 mg/L], p = .03; I-2 = 98%, random-effect modeling), Ferritin (MD: -532.80 ng/ml [95% CI: -810.93, -254.67 ng/ml], p = .0002; I-2 = 25%, random-effect modeling), procalcitonin (MD: -0.67 ng/ml [95% CI: -1.13, -0.22 ng/ml], p = .004; I-2 = 92%, random-effect modeling], and increment in the levels of lymphocyte count (MD: 0.36 x 10(3)/mu l [95% CI: 0.18, 0.54 x 10(3)/mu l], p < .0001; I-2 = 88%, random-effect modeling). Administration of tocilizumab is effective in reducing the biomarkers of the COVID-19 infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据