4.7 Article

Nanocellulose-based reusable liquid metal printed electronics fabricated by evaporation-induced transfer printing

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 132-137

出版社

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.05.040

关键词

Reuse; Liquid metal; Transfer printing; Nanocellulose; Flexible electronics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51605472]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission research fund [Z171100000417004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A nanocellulose-based liquid metal printed circuit was fabricated using evaporation-induced transfer printing technology, offering stability, eco-friendliness, and reusability. This study provides an economical and environmentally friendly approach for renewable flexible electronics.
Reusable electronics have received widespread attention and are urgently needed. Here, nanocellulose-based liquid metal (NC-LM) printed circuit has been fabricated by the evaporation-induced transfer printing technology. In this way, the liquid metal pattern is embedded into the nanocellulose membrane, which is beneficial for the stability of the circuit during use. Besides, the NC-LM circuit is ultrathin with just tens of microns. In particular, the finished product is environmentally friendly because it can be completely dissolved by water, and both the liquid metal ink and the nanocellulose membrane can be easily recollected and reused, thereby reducing waste and pollution to the environment. Several examples of flexible circuits have been designed to evaluate their performance. The mechanism of evaporation-induced transfer printing technology involves the deposition, aggregation, and coverage tightly of the nanosized cellulose fibrils as the water evaporated. This study provides an economical and environmentally friendly way for the fabrication of renewable flexible electronics. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据