4.6 Article

Gas permeability of graphite foil prepared from exfoliated graphite with different microstructures

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 56, 期 6, 页码 4197-4211

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-020-05541-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [AAAA-A16-116053110012-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphite foil prepared from exfoliated graphite at different temperatures showed variations in microstructure and gas permeability, with higher preparation temperatures resulting in increased gas permeance. The presence of amorphous and turbostratic carbon in exfoliated graphite influenced the porous structure and gas permeance of the graphite foil.
Graphite foil (GF) is widely used as a sealing material in different industries. Different methods of GF preparation result in differences of its crystalline and pore structure, which in turn influences its ability to pass through gases and provide the required level of sealability. The influence of the preparation temperature of exfoliated graphite (EG) on the microstructure and gas permeability of EG-based graphite foil was investigated. The preparation of graphite foil consisted of the synthesis of stage-1 graphite bisulfate, followed by washing with water, rapid heating of obtained expandable graphite at temperatures of 600, 800, 1000 degrees C with the formation of exfoliated graphite and the subsequent compression of EG into graphite foil. The structure of the materials was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. The correlation between EG preparation conditions, the presence of amorphous and turbostratic carbon, which influence the GF porous structure and GF gas permeance, was found. Graphite foil based on EG obtained at 600 degrees C had the minimal nitrogen and hydrogen permeances of 0.11.10(-10) and 0.44.10(-10) mol m(-2) s(-1) Pa-1, while the increase in EG preparation temperature up to 1000 degrees C raises GF gas permeance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据