4.2 Article

Flood-induced ground effects and flood-water dynamics for hydro-geomorphic hazard assessment: the 21-22 October 2019 extreme flood along the lower Orba River (Alessandria, NW Italy)

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAPS
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 136-151

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2020.1866702

关键词

Floods; geomorphic effectiveness; geomorphological mapping; alluvial gully; Orba River; north-western Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on the geomorphic response to the extreme flood of the lower Orba River in 2019, which caused severe damage to cultivated fields, structures, and infrastructures. Through post-flood field surveys, GNSS surveys, and aerial photography interpretation, geomorphic changes on the floodplain were mapped, and a specific legend for mapping flood-related and anthropogenic elements in a lowland agricultural landscape with regulated rivers was proposed.
The knowledge of flood-induced ground effects and flood-water dynamics is a crucial issue for hydro-geomorphic hazards assessment and mapping, and thus for river management and land use planning. This paper and the related 1:15,000 map illustrate the lower Orba River (NW Italy) and its adjacent floodplain geomorphic response to the 21-22 October 2019 extreme flood. This was estimated to be a 500-years flood and caused severe damage to cultivated fields, structures, and infrastructures. The research is based on extensive post-flood field surveys, ante- and post-flood GNSS surveys, and aerial photographs interpretation. Intense in-channel sediment mobilization, bank retreats, and channelization structures collapses were surveyed. Furthermore, alluvial gullies, overbank deposits, crevasse splays, and surficial-erosion evidences were mapped over the floodplain, along with the flooded area (17.65 km(2)) and the flood-water features. A specific legend developed for flood-related and anthropogenic elements mapping in a typical lowland agricultural landscape with regulated rivers is proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据