4.5 Article

Modeling of Active Gap Capacitance Electrical Discharge Machining

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4049477

关键词

EDM; capacitive effect; powder mixed; graphene; PCD; advanced materials and processing; electrical and electrochemical machining; machining processes; nontraditional manufacturing processes; powder processing

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP18100762]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51705040]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20150255]
  4. Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province [GDZB148]
  5. Jiangsu Overseas Visiting Scholar Program for University Prominent Young & Middle-aged Teachers and Presidents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AGC-EDM is a high-speed EDM method utilizing active capacitive and powder mixing effects, with a proposed new discharge mechanism. Experimental results verify the capacitance characteristics and chain stacking process of graphene-kerosene dielectrics, and discuss material removal rate, relative electrode wear, and surface roughness with different process parameters.
Active gap capacitance electrical discharge machining (AGC-EDM) is a high-speed EDM method for machining polycrystalline diamond tools utilizing the active capacitive effect and powder mixing effect formed by the kerosene dielectric added with graphene particles. The capacitive effect increases the discharge energy and explosive force, which in turn influences the material removal efficiency; the powder-mixed effect changes the states of dielectric and forms a non-fixed gap discharge process. Take into account these two aspects, a new discharge mechanism of AGC-EDM is proposed to describe the discharge process. Capacitance characteristics and chain stacking process of graphene-kerosene dielectrics are verified by experimental results. The material removal rate, relative electrode wear, and surface roughness are discussed with the pulse duration, peak current, and graphene concentration to study the theories of the new EDM process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据