4.6 Review

Lipid metabolism dysregulation in diabetic retinopathy

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.TR120000981

关键词

fibrate; statin; triglyceride; cholesterol; ceramide; mitochondria; tight junctions; fatty acid

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01EY030766, R01EY016077, R01EY028049, R01EY025383, MICL02539]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review article discusses the potential benefits of lipid-lowering drugs for the prevention and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. While fibrates have shown improvement in DR, there is a disconnect between their effects in the retina and blood lipid levels. The article also highlights lipid and lipoprotein-independent mechanisms that may play a role in retinal protection.
Lipid metabolic abnormalities have emerged as potential risk factors for the development and progression of diabetic complications, including diabetic retinopathy (DR). This review article provides an overview of the results of clinical trials evaluating the potential benefits of lipid-lowering drugs, such as fibrates, omega-3 fatty acids, and statins, for the prevention and treatment of DR. Although several clinical trials demonstrated that treatment with fibrates leads to improvement of DR, there is a dissociation between the protective effects of fibrates in the retina, and the intended blood lipid classes, including plasma triglycerides, total cholesterol, or HDL:LDL cholesterol ratio. Guided by these findings, plasma lipid and lipoprotein-independent mechanisms are addressed based on clinical, cell culture, and animal model studies. Potential retinal-specific effects of fatty acid oxidation products, cholesterol, and ceramide, as well as lipid-independent effects of PPAR alpha activation, are summarized based on the current literature. Overall, this review highlights promising potential of lipid-based treatment strategies further enhanced by the new knowledge of intraretinal lipids and lipoproteins in DR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据