4.5 Article

Immune checkpoint markers and anti-CD20-mediated NK cell activation

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 110, 期 4, 页码 723-733

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/JLB.5A0620-365R

关键词

activation; ADCC; anti‐ CD20 mAb; checkpoint; NK cells

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [P50 CA097274, P30 CA86862]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that TIGIT and TIM3 can serve as markers for anti-CD20-mediated NK cell activation, but may not be suitable as targets for enhancing the anti-tumor activity of this therapy.
Anti-CD20 mAb is an effective therapy for most B-cell malignancies. Checkpoint blockade has been used to enhance T-cell-mediated antitumor response. Little is known about the biologic significance of immune checkpoints expressed by NK cells in anti-CD20-based therapy. To investigate the role of checkpoints in anti-CD20-mediated NK cell biology, Raji B-cell lymphoma cells, and PBMCs from normal donors were cocultured with rituximab (RTX), obinutuzumab (OBZ), or trastuzumab as a control mAb for between 20 h and 9 d. RTX and OBZ induced a dose-dependent NK cell up-regulation of T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domain (TIGIT) and T-cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 (TIM3), but not PD1, CTLA4, or LAG3. Resting CD56(dim) NK had higher TIGIT and TIM3 expression than resting CD56(bright) NK although TIGIT and TIM3 were up-regulated on both subsets. NK cells with the CD16 158VV single nucleotide polymorphism had greater TIM3 up-regulation than did NK from VF or FF donors. TIGIT(+) and TIM3(+) NK cells degranulated, produced cytokines, and expressed activation markers to a greater degree than did TIGIT(-) or TIM3(-) NK cells. Blockade of TIGIT, TIM3, or both had little impact on RTX-induced NK cell proliferation, degranulation, cytokine production, or activation. Taken together, TIGIT and TIM3 can serve as markers for anti-CD20-mediated NK cell activation, but may not serve well as targets for enhancing the anti-tumor activity of such therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据