A comparison of voxel- and surface-based cone-beam computed tomography mandibular superimposition in adult orthodontic patients

Objective To evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of voxel- and surface-based registrations for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) mandibular superimposition in adult orthodontic patients. Methods Pre- and post-orthodontic treatment CBCT scans of 27 adult patients were obtained. Voxel- and surface-based CBCT mandibular superimpositions were performed using the mandibular basal bone as a reference. The accuracy of the two methods was evaluated using the absolute mean distance measured. The time that was required to perform the measurements using these methods was also compared. Statistical differences were determined using paired t-tests, and inter-observer reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results The absolute mean distance on seven mandible surface areas between voxel- and surface-based registrations was similar but not significantly different. ICC values of the surface-based registration were 0.918 to 0.990, which were slightly lower than those of voxel-based registration that ranged from 0.984 to 0.996. The time required for voxel-based registration and surface-based registration was 44.6 +/- 2.5 s and 252.3 +/- 7.1 s, respectively. Conclusions Both methods are accurate and reliable and not significantly different from each other. However, voxel-based registration is more efficient than surface-based registration for CBCT mandibular superimposition.

Automated summary

The study evaluated the accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of voxel- and surface-based registrations for CBCT mandibular superimposition in adult orthodontic patients. Results showed both methods to be accurate and reliable, with voxel-based registration being more efficient than surface-based registration.