4.7 Article

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Virulence Factor α-Hemolysin Reduces Histone Acetylation to Inhibit Expression of Proinflammatory Cytokine Genes

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 223, 期 6, 页码 1040-1051

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiab018

关键词

uropathogenic Escherichia coli; histone acetylation; acetyl-CoA; ACLY; NF kappa B signaling

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [BH93/1-4]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81700609, 81901466]
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UPEC infection manipulates host cell metabolism to inhibit inflammatory cytokine production by suppressing ATP citrate lyase, leading to reduced histone acetylation and decreased expression of immune response genes. This effect can be reversed by acetate supplementation and improves tissue recovery in a murine cystitis model.
Urinary tract infections are common and costly diseases affecting millions of people. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is a primary cause of these infections and has developed multiple strategies to avoid the host immune response. Here, we dissected the molecular mechanisms underpinning UPEC inhibition of inflammatory cytokine in vitro and in vivo. We found that UPEC infection simulates nuclear factor-kappa B activation but does not result in transcription of cytokine genes. Instead, UPEC-mediated suppression of the metabolic enzyme ATP citrate lyase results in decreased acetyl-CoA levels, leading to reduced H3K9 histone acetylation in the promotor region of CXCL8. These effects were dependent on the UPEC virulence factor alpha-hemolysin and were reversed by exogenous acetate. In a murine cystitis model, prior acetate supplementation rapidly resolved UPEC-elicited immune responses and improved tissue recovery. Thus, upon infection, UPEC rearranges host cell metabolism to induce chromatin remodeling processes that subvert expression of host innate immune response genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据