4.0 Article

Pride and Uncertainty: A Qualitative Study of Danish Nursing Staff in Temporary COVID-19 Wards

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 140-144

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000722

关键词

corona; COVID-19; palliation; supervision

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the psychosocial stress among nursing staff working on the COVID-19 wards, highlighting the experiences of frontline health care workers facing major work changes. The findings emphasize the importance of continuous managerial attention and support to address increasing burden and uncertainty among nursing staff during the outbreak.
There is limited knowledge about the psychosocial stress among the nursing staff working on the COVID-19 wards. This article reports on the experiences of frontline health care workers as it was described to supervisors counseling the nursing staff engaged in the response to the outbreak of COVID-19. Frontline health care workers, nurses, and nurses' aides experienced major work changes. Some were transferred to the newly formed COVID-19 wards in a large Danish hospital, were given new tasks, and had to collaborate with new colleagues, while treating a new deadly and contagious disease. This study aimed to describe the reflections and experiences of the nursing staff attending supervision sessions. The palliative unit offered supervision from April 2020. A total of 9 supervision sessions were held as part of this study, and 57 nursing staff members participated in the sessions. The supervision was available to employees until the first COVID wave subsided in June 2020. During each session, supervisors took field notes and wrote field memos. The topics raised by the nursing staff during the supervision sessions ranged between pride and uncertainty. Nursing staff in COVID-19 wards were at risk of feeling an increasing burden, and there was a need for ongoing managerial attention as well as continuous visible presence and support.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据